<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Event id: 9667 &#8211; When database reaches maximum limit of named properties or replica identifiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/</link>
	<description>Learn Exchange the Guru way !!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandra Sekhar</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-6985</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandra Sekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-6985</guid>
		<description>Hi- What is the maximum count of email ids, that MAPI can support. Please advise asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi- What is the maximum count of email ids, that MAPI can support. Please advise asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nain Agha</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Nain Agha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Great Found ! nice work, works for me running sbs.

Highly appreciated ! 

Thanks
Nain Agha
nagha@hilltopconsultants.com
Hilltop Consultants, Inc
2010 P st NW 20036</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Found ! nice work, works for me running sbs.</p>
<p>Highly appreciated ! </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Nain Agha<br />
<a href="mailto:nagha@hilltopconsultants.com">nagha@hilltopconsultants.com</a><br />
Hilltop Consultants, Inc<br />
2010 P st NW 20036</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neal</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3927</link>
		<dc:creator>neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3927</guid>
		<description>FWIW the registry fix did it for me - the store is still under 20GB. The Exchange store default value was previously raised to 32GB. Is there a reason not to raise the x-header limit to 32K instead of 16K?

I did not run the KB972077 patch and unless there other reasons to do so I think I&#039;ll pass on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW the registry fix did it for me &#8211; the store is still under 20GB. The Exchange store default value was previously raised to 32GB. Is there a reason not to raise the x-header limit to 32K instead of 16K?</p>
<p>I did not run the KB972077 patch and unless there other reasons to do so I think I&#8217;ll pass on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neal</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>Thanks all. one would think doubling the value to 16K with a mount/dismount would do the trick. Why then is KB972077 a 40MB download to change one registry value? Methinks there must be more undocumented features in this patch.

Apparently this is the cost of maintaining legacy hardware...users outgrow the default values of 4GB mailboxes and 8192K table entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all. one would think doubling the value to 16K with a mount/dismount would do the trick. Why then is KB972077 a 40MB download to change one registry value? Methinks there must be more undocumented features in this patch.</p>
<p>Apparently this is the cost of maintaining legacy hardware&#8230;users outgrow the default values of 4GB mailboxes and 8192K table entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3803</guid>
		<description>Hi Ratish,

Yes, it&#039;s pretty much constant - always from one machine which just happens to be the last machine we&#039;ve added and the only Windows 7 machine we have and the only machine running Office 2010.

She&#039;s unable to reply to messages or add conacts.

I&#039;m preparing to apply the patch from Microsoft KB 972077.  Do you have any thoughts about whether that will help my issue?

Thanks,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ratish,</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s pretty much constant &#8211; always from one machine which just happens to be the last machine we&#8217;ve added and the only Windows 7 machine we have and the only machine running Office 2010.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s unable to reply to messages or add conacts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m preparing to apply the patch from Microsoft KB 972077.  Do you have any thoughts about whether that will help my issue?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratish Sekhar</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3802</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratish Sekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3802</guid>
		<description>@Paul - Are you getting this event often? I suggest you open a case with MS PSS to see what/which application is consuming your database&#039;s props id...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; Are you getting this event often? I suggest you open a case with MS PSS to see what/which application is consuming your database&#8217;s props id&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3799</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running a 2003 SBS server that&#039;s getting Event ID 9667.  How can I create a new database when SBS allows only one?

Thanks
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running a 2003 SBS server that&#8217;s getting Event ID 9667.  How can I create a new database when SBS allows only one?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratish Sekhar</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratish Sekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>All we are doing is dumping the props quota using MFCMapi... you wont use any messages...
Again, how can a user throw this error? Remember that 9646 is different from 9667...

Send me an email with the event id and description and I&#039;ll check to see if I can help....

The ONLY scenario in which I had to dump the DB props quota was once an SAP system processing automated emails was trying to add named props again and again &quot;one a new database&quot;(coz of some reason) and as soon as I identified it, asked them to work on their system and they fixed it somehow....

99% times, I move the user to another store and eventually re-create the database.... This has improved a lot in E2K7....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All we are doing is dumping the props quota using MFCMapi&#8230; you wont use any messages&#8230;<br />
Again, how can a user throw this error? Remember that 9646 is different from 9667&#8230;</p>
<p>Send me an email with the event id and description and I&#8217;ll check to see if I can help&#8230;.</p>
<p>The ONLY scenario in which I had to dump the DB props quota was once an SAP system processing automated emails was trying to add named props again and again &#8220;one a new database&#8221;(coz of some reason) and as soon as I identified it, asked them to work on their system and they fixed it somehow&#8230;.</p>
<p>99% times, I move the user to another store and eventually re-create the database&#8230;. This has improved a lot in E2K7&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC Faulk</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>RC Faulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>Let me better ask my above question.  The user that is throwing the event code in Event Viewer on Exchagne 2003 is using Outlook 2007 and have messages saved.  If I dump out the table that has reached its quota...will they loose any message.

Thanks
rC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me better ask my above question.  The user that is throwing the event code in Event Viewer on Exchagne 2003 is using Outlook 2007 and have messages saved.  If I dump out the table that has reached its quota&#8230;will they loose any message.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
rC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC Faulk</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/04/event-id-9667/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>RC Faulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=216#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>So if I dump out the table and empty it then will any message saved to the user with the problem in there outlook disappear?

Thanks,
RC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I dump out the table and empty it then will any message saved to the user with the problem in there outlook disappear?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
RC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

