<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Offline defrag worth it ???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/</link>
	<description>Learn Exchange the Guru way !!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Exchange 2010 deals with whitespace &#171; MSExchangeGuru.com</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>How Exchange 2010 deals with whitespace &#171; MSExchangeGuru.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>[...] Refer this article for more information: http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Refer this article for more information: <a href="http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/" rel="nofollow">http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratish Sekhar</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratish Sekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 10:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,
Please look for the section &quot;How to run OFFLINE DEFRAG&quot; in step 23 @ http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/07/12/exchange-database-recovery-using-eseutil-commands/

Ratish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
Please look for the section &#8220;How to run OFFLINE DEFRAG&#8221; in step 23 @ <a href="http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/07/12/exchange-database-recovery-using-eseutil-commands/" rel="nofollow">http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/07/12/exchange-database-recovery-using-eseutil-commands/</a></p>
<p>Ratish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lindner</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Hi Ratish HRU doing.
Any way could you give the exact syntex for offline defrag.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ratish HRU doing.<br />
Any way could you give the exact syntex for offline defrag.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shambhu Sharma</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Shambhu Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 04:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Best Practice is Learn about offline de-fragmentation but don&#039;t do at first or second stage. This is the last option to claim the white space but make sure you should 110% space available and good backup. The good practice is move the mailboxes to new stores which will ask you very little time for downtime per mailboxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Practice is Learn about offline de-fragmentation but don&#8217;t do at first or second stage. This is the last option to claim the white space but make sure you should 110% space available and good backup. The good practice is move the mailboxes to new stores which will ask you very little time for downtime per mailboxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratish Sekhar</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratish Sekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Troy,

Good day. I am assuming you need to perform an offline defrag to reclaim space on the drive.
But did you make sure that the database has enough of white-space available ?? Check for event id 1221 and it should tell you.

Now, runnning it on a different machine is never been easier.

There is a great kb article on it
How to run Eseutil on a computer without Exchange Server: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244525/

You just need to copy and paste these files to a location and run it from there. Eseutil.exe, Ese.dll, Jcb.dll, Exosal.dll, and Exchmem.dll 
Now, the real question, what after offline defrag ??? As soon as you copy and paste the defragged database to production, these might happen.

     1. Blackberry user might get garbled messages in inbox.
     2. Outlook users might complain of Outlook being slow and some duplicate entries.
     3. This issue would get resolved, if you reconfigure their profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troy,</p>
<p>Good day. I am assuming you need to perform an offline defrag to reclaim space on the drive.<br />
But did you make sure that the database has enough of white-space available ?? Check for event id 1221 and it should tell you.</p>
<p>Now, runnning it on a different machine is never been easier.</p>
<p>There is a great kb article on it<br />
How to run Eseutil on a computer without Exchange Server: <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244525/" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/244525/</a></p>
<p>You just need to copy and paste these files to a location and run it from there. Eseutil.exe, Ese.dll, Jcb.dll, Exosal.dll, and Exchmem.dll<br />
Now, the real question, what after offline defrag ??? As soon as you copy and paste the defragged database to production, these might happen.</p>
<p>     1. Blackberry user might get garbled messages in inbox.<br />
     2. Outlook users might complain of Outlook being slow and some duplicate entries.<br />
     3. This issue would get resolved, if you reconfigure their profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TS</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>TS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Ratish or anyone else,

I am about to run an offline defrag of my 03 database on a seperate computer since my drive on the email server is full.  I was told that the eseutil is a stand alone program and that I would have no problem stoping the store and copying the files to another server to run the defrag and then copying the files back.  Do you see any issues with this?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratish or anyone else,</p>
<p>I am about to run an offline defrag of my 03 database on a seperate computer since my drive on the email server is full.  I was told that the eseutil is a stand alone program and that I would have no problem stoping the store and copying the files to another server to run the defrag and then copying the files back.  Do you see any issues with this?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-59</guid>
		<description>i think the time frame is not exact it actually depends on the database like 4- 5 GB per hour it actually varies it takes even more or even less . if Defrag is really necessary and we need the production as well we can have a dial tone strategy ...... (concept of RSG and merging of data).

**note** when there is change in database some user using other than OL 2003 SP2 or later  may need to create new profile</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the time frame is not exact it actually depends on the database like 4- 5 GB per hour it actually varies it takes even more or even less . if Defrag is really necessary and we need the production as well we can have a dial tone strategy &#8230;&#8230; (concept of RSG and merging of data).</p>
<p>**note** when there is change in database some user using other than OL 2003 SP2 or later  may need to create new profile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Just done with offline defrag on Exchange 2007. I have 4 DB&#039;s and on of them 60GB took me about an hour to finish offline defrag and i bit less for integrity check. 

and do not forget to perform full backup once you done :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just done with offline defrag on Exchange 2007. I have 4 DB&#8217;s and on of them 60GB took me about an hour to finish offline defrag and i bit less for integrity check. </p>
<p>and do not forget to perform full backup once you done <img src='http://msexchangeguru.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan S</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Any offline defrag raises a red flag during an Exchange health check from MS. They recommend moving all mailboxes out of a defraged/repaired databases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any offline defrag raises a red flag during an Exchange health check from MS. They recommend moving all mailboxes out of a defraged/repaired databases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Irfan Sadiq</title>
		<link>http://msexchangeguru.com/2009/09/08/offline-defrag/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Irfan Sadiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msexchangeguru.com/?p=227#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Ratish,

I have been exclusively wrking with Exchange Server since 2003, and have learned as per Microsoft Best Practices to perform an offline Database Defrag, since Online defrag (Daily Maintainence Interval) simply deleted the basic level files to clean up the Exchange database. In couple of Exchange Master Certification Trainings i was advised by Exchange Rangers group to perform an offline defrag at  least once every quarter. If the Exchange Database is designed by MS best practices ( Exchange 2003 50GB / per MBDB &amp; Exchange 2007 100GB / MBDB) it does not take awfull long time to perform Eseutil /p , Eseutil/d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratish,</p>
<p>I have been exclusively wrking with Exchange Server since 2003, and have learned as per Microsoft Best Practices to perform an offline Database Defrag, since Online defrag (Daily Maintainence Interval) simply deleted the basic level files to clean up the Exchange database. In couple of Exchange Master Certification Trainings i was advised by Exchange Rangers group to perform an offline defrag at  least once every quarter. If the Exchange Database is designed by MS best practices ( Exchange 2003 50GB / per MBDB &amp; Exchange 2007 100GB / MBDB) it does not take awfull long time to perform Eseutil /p , Eseutil/d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

