MSExchangeGuru.com

Bad Checksum on Exchange Database

A Bad checksum error on an Exchange Database indicates a database corruption. If you notice the same, consider moving mailboxes ASAP if the stores are still mounted or perform a repair if it went down.

—

Meera Nair

Posted July 13th, 2009 under Database Management. RSS 2.0 feed. Leave a response, or trackback.

3 Responses to “Bad Checksum on Exchange Database”

1. Vignesh Says:
   November 1st, 2009 at 6:23 pm

   Good one buddy!!!

2. Lepide Exchange Manager for Microsoft Exchange « MSExchangeGuru.com Says:
   August 2nd, 2012 at 1:02 pm

   […] Bad Checksum on Exchange Database: https://msexchangeguru.com/2009/07/13/checksum-error/ […]

3. Exchange Database Recovery – Using eseutil commands « MSExchangeGuru.com Says:
   August 3rd, 2012 at 6:06 pm

   […] North America 2012Lepide Exchange Manager for Microsoft Exchange « MSExchangeGuru.com on Bad Checksum on Exchange DatabaseWane on Troubleshooting Active Directory account lockout issuesOther cool […]

Leave a Reply

Categories

• Active Directory
• ADFS
• ADRMS
• Autodiscover
• Azure
• Best Practices
• Blackberry
• CAS
• Certificate Authority
• Clustering
• Co-existence
• Conference
• Cumulative Update
• DAG
• Database Management
• Disaster Recovery
• ECP
• Edge
• Edge Transport
• Exchange 2003
• Exchange 2007
• Exchange 2010
• Exchange 2013
• Exchange 2016
• Exchange 2019
• Exchange ActiveSync
• Exchange Online Protection
• Exchange Tools
• ExMerge
• Export Mailbox using Shell
• GFI
• Installation
• IOS
• LegacyExchangeDN
• Lync
• MailFlow
• MFA
• Migration
• Miscellaneous blabberings
• msExch Attributes
• OAB
• OAB/OAL
• Office 365
• Online and Offline Defrag
• Outlook
• OWA
• POP/IMAP
• Powershell
• Public Folders
• RBAC
• Recovery
• Recovery Storage Group
• Removal
• Scripting
• Site Updates
• Skype for Business
• SQL
• Tech Buzz
• Tips
• Transport
• Uncategorized
• Update
• Windows 10
• Windows 2012 R2

Archives

• March 2021
• January 2021
• December 2019
• November 2019
• September 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• July 2018
• June 2018
• May 2018
• April 2018
• March 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• December 2017
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• July 2017
• June 2017
• May 2017
• April 2017
• March 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• July 2016
• June 2016
• May 2016
• April 2016
• March 2016
• February 2016
• January 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• July 2015
• June 2015
• May 2015
• April 2015
• March 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• December 2014
• November 2014
• October 2014
• September 2014
• August 2014
• July 2014
• June 2014
• May 2014
• April 2014
• March 2014
• February 2014
• January 2014
• December 2013
• November 2013
• October 2013
• September 2013
• August 2013
• July 2013
• June 2013
• May 2013
• April 2013
• March 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• July 2012
• June 2012
• May 2012
• April 2012
• March 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• July 2011
• June 2011
• May 2011
• April 2011
• March 2011
• February 2011
• January 2011
• December 2010
• November 2010
• October 2010
• September 2010
• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009